🧠 MOC — Methods & Frameworks
Overview
All research, development, and knowledge management methodologies integrated in PUMA and this vault.
📊 Research Methodologies
Design Science Research (DSR)
- PN-DSR-SLR-Methods — DSR paradigm explanation
- Core idea: research must produce and evaluate useful artefacts. PUMA artefact = benchmark framework.
- SRC-MITAILab-WP316 — MIT AI Lab WP316 (active research methods)
- Reference: Hevner et al. (2004), Peffers et al. (2007)
Systematic Literature Review (SLR + PRISMA)
- PN-DSR-SLR-Methods — SLR protocol
- PN-Wilcoxon-FINER-Cornell-PRISMA — PRISMA + FINER
- PRISMA-Log — Active screening log
- WF-SLR-Pipeline — Step-by-step workflow
Statistical Methods
- PN-Wilcoxon-FINER-Cornell-PRISMA — Wilcoxon + effect sizes
- Wilcoxon signed-rank (α=0.05, two-sided), effect size r = Z/√N
- PN-StatisticalValidation-Full — Full pipeline: normality → Wilcoxon → effect size → bootstrap CI → BH correction
- PN-Evaluation-Metrics-Comprehensive — Complete metrics reference (F1, MAE, SA, SPR, CO₂, AUC-ROC, etc.)
Reference Class Forecasting (RCF)
- PN-UniquenessTrap — Uniqueness Trap + RCF algorithm + PUMA mapping
- LN-Flyvbjerg-2023-UniquenessTrap — Source: Flyvbjerg (2023)
🤖 Development Methodologies
Spec-Driven Development (SDD)
- PN-SDD-Framework — Full SDD explanation
- SP-PUMA-Constitution — PUMA constitution (non-negotiables)
- SP-Architecture — Architecture spec
- SP-Triage-Agent — Triage agent spec
OpenSpec
- PN-SDD-Framework — OpenSpec section
- Best for: brownfield / iterative spec updates
Spec Kit (GitHub)
- PN-SDD-Framework — Spec Kit section
- Best for: greenfield with strict phase gates + constitution.md
BMAD (Multi-Agent Simulation)
- BMAD-Agent-Roster — All 6 agents
- BMAD-PRD-PUMA — Product Requirements Document
- PT-BMAD-Agent-Prompts — All agent prompts
Context-Driven Development (CDD)
- All PUMA prompts use CDD: explicit project context in every AI interaction
- PT-PUMA-Experiment-Prompts — CDD in practice
📚 Knowledge Management Methodologies
PARA (Projects, Areas, Resources, Archive)
- PN-PARA-GTD-Zettelkasten — Integration note
- Implemented in vault:
10→70folder structure
GTD (Getting Things Done)
- PN-PARA-GTD-Zettelkasten — Integration note
- Implemented in:
10 - Inbox/,90 - GTD/
Zettelkasten
- PN-PARA-GTD-Zettelkasten — Integration note
- Implemented in:
30 - Permanent/(flat, atomic, linked)
Johnny Decimal
- JD-Master-Index — Full index
- Implemented in: all folder numbers (10–90, decimal sub-IDs)
Maps of Content (MOCs)
- MOC-PUMA-Master — Master project MOC
- MOC-Research-Pipeline — Research pipeline MOC
- MOC-Literature-Review — Literature MOC
🤖 AI Prompting Methodologies
Keshav Three-Pass Method
- PN-MIT-Student-Method — Summary explanation
- PN-MIT-Student-Method-Complete — Complete Q1/Q2/Q3 + Keshav integration
- SRC-Keshav-2007-HowToReadPaper — Source: Keshav (2007)
- PER-Keshav-Srinivasan — Author profile
- Keshav-Reading-Log — Reading log
- Template-Keshav-ThreePass — Per-paper template
RCOIF Framework
- PN-RCOIF-Framework — Full explanation
- Role · Context · Objective · Instructions · Format
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) + Zero-Shot CoT
- PN-CoT-FewShot-Prompting — Permanent note
- PUMA prompting Strategy 4 (most complex)
One-Shot and Few-Shot Prompting
- PN-CoT-FewShot-Prompting — Permanent note
- PUMA prompting Strategies 2 and 3
CO-STAR + Self-Consistency + Structured Output
- PN-COSTAR-SelfConsistency — CO-STAR 6-component template; Self-Consistency k-sampling; JSON mode strategies
- LN-Shum-2025-PensarConPrompts — Comprehensive prompt engineering taxonomy
Contextual Anchoring
- Used in all PUMA triage prompts: restate key constraints at prompt end
- PT-Advanced-Prompts-IIPR-Anchoring-AgentOS
EGI (Exploración Guiada Interactiva)
- PN-EGI-Framework — Full explanation
- Used for: domain exploration in new literature areas
AMI (Autodiagnóstico y Mejora Iterativa)
- PN-AMI-DRCA-IIPR-Frameworks — Full explanation
- Used for: iterative improvement of writing + prompts
DRCA (Deconstrucción y Reconstrucción Conceptual Avanzada)
- PN-AMI-DRCA-IIPR-Frameworks — Full explanation
- Used for: deep processing of complex papers (Keshav Pass-3 equivalent)
IIPR (Ingeniería Inversa de Prompts y Respuestas)
- PN-AMI-DRCA-IIPR-Frameworks — Full explanation
- Used for: diagnosing and fixing underperforming prompts
Reflexion (Verbal Self-Reflection Loop)
- PN-Reflexion-SelfCritique — Architecture + PUMA implementation (Stage 4 iterative triage)
- LN-Shinn-2023-Reflexion — Source: Shinn et al. (NeurIPS 2023)
Tree of Thoughts (ToT)
- PN-TreeOfThoughts-Deliberate — BFS/DFS search over reasoning steps; PUMA Stage 3 sprint planning
- LN-Yao-2023-TreeOfThoughts — Source: Yao et al. (NeurIPS 2023)
- Key distinction from CoT: supports backtracking; 18.5× improvement on multi-step problems; 50–200× compute cost
Context Engineering (CE)
- PN-ContextEngineering — Six-slot context pipeline; token budget allocation; context pollution mitigation
- LN-Videos-Context-Engineering — Video references
- CE = 2026 successor to Prompt Engineering: design the information system that fills the context, not just the prompt text
RLHF and Constitutional AI
- PN-RLHF-Constitutional — RLHF pipeline, DPO, Constitutional AI, RLAIF; alignment method per PUMA model
- Alignment training paradigm for all PUMA models (Llama-Instruct, Claude Sonnet, DeepSeek-R1)
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
- PN-MCP-ModelContextProtocol — Architecture, security threats, PUMA Stage 5 integration
- LN-Hou-2025-MCP-Security — Source: Hou et al. (2025)
- LN-Videos-MCP-Protocols — Video references
Transformer Architecture and MoE
- PN-Transformer-MoE — Self-attention, GQA, RoPE, SwiGLU, MoE routing, KV cache; PUMA model technical reference
- LN-Fedus-2022-SwitchTransformers — MoE source: Fedus et al. (JMLR 2022)
- Foundation for understanding DeepSeek-V3 MoE efficiency rationale (671B total / 37B active)
Marco Veritas (AI Transparency & Academic Integrity)
- PN-Veritas-Framework — Full framework: proactive disclosure, primary source verification, no delegation of judgement
- AI-Use-Log — PUMA AI use log (PRISMA-trAIce compliance)
- Author: Codina (2024) · Applied in: PUMA Constitution §7, BMAD QA Agent audit
AI Code Quality (Empirical Evidence)
- LN-CodeRabbit-2025-AIvsHumanCode — CodeRabbit (2025): 470 PRs, AI 1.7× more issues, 2.74× security, 3× readability; 7 mitigation strategies mapped to PUMA design
🏢 Business Systems & Operations Management
Systems Thinking & Process Documentation
- LN-Carpenter-2025-WorkTheSystem — Work the System (Carpenter, 2025): systems mindset, SOP documentation, working ON vs. IN the business
- LN-Gerber-2009-EMythRevisited — The E-Myth Revisited (Gerber, 2009): franchise prototype model, Technician/Manager/Entrepreneur trichotomy
Business Operating Systems
- LN-Wickman-2012-Traction — Traction / EOS (Wickman, 2012): 6-component operating system (Vision, People, Data, Issues, Process, Traction)
- LN-Harnish-2022-ScalingUp — Scaling Up (Harnish, 2022): Rockefeller Habits, Four Decisions, One-Page Strategic Plan
Theory of Constraints (TOC)
- LN-Goldratt-2004-TheGoal — The Goal (Goldratt & Cox, 2004): TOC, Five Focusing Steps, Drum-Buffer-Rope, throughput accounting
- Core concept: identify bottleneck → exploit → subordinate → elevate → repeat
Customer Experience & Frictionless Design
- LN-Price-2022-Frictionless — The Frictionless Organization (Price & Jaffe, 2022): Customer Effort Score, friction mapping, DIRTFT, five demand types
🔗 Orphan Check
LIST
FROM "30 - Permanent/33 Frameworks"
WHERE file.name != this.file.name
SORT file.name ASC