🔑 Keywords — Category 1: AI Agents and Swarm Intelligence

This category covers the technical architecture and interaction paradigms of AI agents, directly relevant to PUMA’s experimental system design and Smart PMO vision.


Keyword Index

#TermDefinitionPUMA Relevance
1Agentic AIAI systems capable of autonomous goal-directed action, using tools, memory, and multi-step reasoning without step-by-step human instruction.Core concept of PUMA — the triage and estimation agents operate agentically over Jira/TAWOS data.
2Multi-Agent Systems (MAS)Systems composed of multiple interacting autonomous agents, each with specialized roles, communicating to achieve shared goals.PUMA Stage 5 (Smart PMO) implements MAS with role-specialized agents: triage, estimation, planning, reporting.
3Swarm IntelligenceCollective and decentralized behavior of autonomous systems that collaborate to solve complex problems, inspired by biological swarms (ants, bees).The SwarmPM concept in PUMA draws from swarm intelligence — agents share insights without central control.
4LLM OrchestrationThe process of coordinating and directing one or more large language models through a pipeline or workflow to complete complex tasks.LangGraph provides LLM orchestration for PUMA’s state machine governing agent transitions.
5Local LLMsLarge language models deployed and run on local hardware (CPU/GPU) without cloud API dependency, preserving data sovereignty and enabling reproducibility.PUMA uses Llama 3.2 8B and Mistral 7B via Ollama — both local LLMs at temperature=0, seed=42.
6Autonomous AgentsSoftware entities that perceive their environment, make decisions, and take actions to achieve specified goals without continuous human guidance.PUMA’s triage agent autonomously classifies Jira issues; estimation agent predicts story points.
7Agentic WorkflowsMulti-step task pipelines where AI agents plan, execute, verify, and iterate — transcending single-prompt generation.Andrew Ng’s four agentic workflow patterns (reflection, tool-use, planning, multi-agent) frame PUMA’s four prompting strategies.
8SwarmPM FrameworkPUMA’s proposed multi-agent architecture for project management, combining specialized agents for triage, estimation, risk detection, and planning in a swarm-like coordination pattern.Directly references PUMA’s Stage 5 architecture — the Smart PMO swarm.
9LangGraph State MachineA LangGraph-based stateful directed graph that models agent behavior as transitions between states, with checkpointing and conditional routing.PUMA’s experiment runner uses LangGraph state machine for the four-strategy × two-model evaluation loop.
10CrewAI Role-PlayingA framework for defining AI agent teams with explicit roles, goals, backstories, and task assignments using a declarative YAML/Python interface.PUMA uses CrewAI for declarative role definitions in Stage 5 agent team (Triage Agent, Estimation Agent, Manager).
11Model Context Protocol (MCP)An open standard for connecting AI agents to external data sources and tools via a unified interface, analogous to a “USB-C for AI”.PUMA Stage 5 uses MCP to connect Smart PMO agents to Jira API and GitHub API without custom integrations.
12Agent Operating System (Agent OS)An operating system layer that manages agent memory, tool access, planning, and execution, analogous to how an OS manages hardware resources for applications.Conceptually frames PUMA’s LangGraph + Qdrant + PostgreSQL stack as the agent OS for Smart PMO.
13Human-in-the-Loop (HITL)A design principle requiring human oversight and approval at critical decision points within an automated AI workflow, ensuring bounded autonomy.PUMA Constitution Article 4: HITL is mandatory for any agent decision with high confidence threshold or high-impact consequence.
14Bounded AutonomyThe principle that autonomous agents operate within predefined boundaries — escalating to humans when decisions exceed their delegated authority.PUMA’s ethical governance model: agents classify and estimate but cannot change production Jira without human approval.
15Goal-Directed SystemsAI systems that pursue specified objectives through planning and action selection, adapting their behavior based on feedback from the environment.PUMA’s agents are goal-directed: maximize F1-macro for triage, minimize MAE for estimation.
16Collaborative IntelligenceThe combined capabilities of human and AI agents working together, where each compensates for the other’s limitations to achieve outcomes neither could alone.PUMA’s human-AI collaboration model: AI handles volume and consistency; PM handles context and judgment.
17Agent Communication ProtocolsStandardized formats and channels for information exchange between agents in a multi-agent system (e.g., JSON messages, MCP tool calls, LangGraph state updates).PUMA Stage 5: agents communicate via LangGraph shared state dict; external tools via MCP.
18Reasoning SubstratesThe underlying cognitive mechanisms (chain-of-thought, working memory, reflection loops) that support complex reasoning in LLM-based agents.PUMA’s CoT strategy (Strategy 4) explicitly uses reasoning substrate — the model is asked to reason step-by-step before classifying.
19Recursive Self-ImprovementA hypothetical or emerging capability of AI systems to iteratively improve their own performance or architecture without human intervention.Referenced in PUMA’s future work section — potential path for Smart PMO agents to learn from sprint retrospectives.
20Emergent Behavior in AgentsComplex collective behaviors that arise from simple interactions between agents, not explicitly programmed but emergent from the system dynamics.Observed in PUMA Stage 5 prototypes: agents develop implicit specialization patterns not explicitly defined.

"agentic AI" OR "AI agents" OR "autonomous agents" AND "project management"
"multi-agent systems" OR "MAS" AND "software engineering"
"LangGraph" OR "LLM orchestration" AND benchmark
"swarm intelligence" AND "project management" AND AI
"human-in-the-loop" AND "LLM agent" AND governance

Date filter: 2023–2026


MOCs